An XML Based Framework for Merging Incomplete and Inconsistent Statistical Information from Clinical Trials
نویسندگان
چکیده
Meta-analysis is a vital task for systematically summarizing statistical results from clinical trials that are carried out to compare the effect of one medication (or other treatment) against another. Currently, most meta-analysis activities are done by manually pooling data. This is a very time consuming and expensive task. An automated or even semi-automated tool that can support some of the processes underlying meta-analysis is greatly needed. Furthermore, statistical results from clinical trials are usually represented as sampling distributions (i.e., with the mean value and the SEM). When collecting statistical information from reports on clinical trials, not all reports contain full statistical information (i.e., some do not provide SEMs) whilst traditional meta-analysis excludes trials reports that contain incomplete information, which inevitably ignores many trials that could be valuable. Furthermore, some trials results can be significantly inconsistent with the rest of trials that address the same problem. Therefore, highlighting (resp. removing) such inconsistencies is also very important to reveal (resp. reduce) any potential flaws in some of the trials results. In this paper, we aim to design and develop a framework that tackles the above three issues. We first present an XML-based merging framework that aims to merge statistical information automatically with the potential to add a component to extract clinical trials information automatically. This framework shall consider any valid clinical trial including trials with partial information. We then develop a method to analyze inconsistencies among a collection of clinical trials and if necessary to exclude any trials that are deemed to be illegible. Finally, we use two sets of clinical trials, trials on Type 2 diabetes and on neurocognitive outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularisation, to illustrate our framework. keywords XML, Meta-analysis, Merging, Incomplete information, Sampling distribution, Semantic heterogeneity, Information Extraction
منابع مشابه
Measuring the Quality of Uncertain Information Using Possibilistic Logic
In previous papers, we have presented a framework for merging structured information in XML involving uncertainty in the form of probabilities, degrees of beliefs and necessity measures [HL04,HL05a,HL05b]. In this paper, we focus on the quality of uncertain information before merging. We first provide two definitions for measuring information quality of individually inconsistent possibilistic X...
متن کاملThe First Twente Data Management Workshop TDM ’ 04 on XML Databases and Information Retrieval
In this paper we present the merging component of the MUMIS project which combines several xml-documents into one resulting xml-document. The domain of application of the MUMIS project is soccer, and each xml-document contains information about soccer games. The input documents for the merging component contain incomplete, often erroneous, and mutually inconsistent information on the same game....
متن کاملXaver and the SearX-Engine: XML Retrieval in Real World Applications
In this paper we present the merging component of the MUMIS project which combines several xml-documents into one resulting xml-document. The domain of application of the MUMIS project is soccer, and each xml-document contains information about soccer games. The input documents for the merging component contain incomplete, often erroneous, and mutually inconsistent information on the same game....
متن کاملIncomplete Statistical Information Fusion and Its Application to Clinical Trials Data
In medical clinical trials, overall trial results are highlighted in the abstracts of papers/reports. These results are summaries of underlying statistical analysis where most of the time normal distributions are assumed in the analysis. It is common for clinicians to focus on the information in the abstracts in order to review or integrate several clinical trial results that address the same o...
متن کاملMerging potentially inconsistent items of structured text
Structured text is a general concept that is implicit in a variety of approaches to handling information. Syntactically, an item of structured text is a number of grammatically simple phrases together with a semantic label for each phrase. Items of structured text may be nested within larger items of structured text. The semantic labels in a structured text are meant to parameterize a stereotyp...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010